Did You Know
QUERY: Our condo documents stipulate a $100 fee for a resale packet, our property manager is telling us CIOA “requires him to charge $125.”
FALSE: CIOA, Sec. 47 270 stipulates in part…………… “a fee established by the association that does not exceed one hundred twenty-five dollars:. The fee established by the Association is $100.
QUERY: Our management company says that in addition to the $125, they can charge an extra $25 to copy our condo documents for Resale Packets.
FALSE: CIOA, Sec. 47 270. Resale of units clearly states if sending hard copies of condo documents, the charge is five cents per page. For example: combining your declaration, rules, bylaw, a foreclosure policy and/or maintenance standards with a total of 91 pages, the cost would be 91 x $0.05 or $4.55. As a responsible board, you need to instruct management to provide a refund to the selling owners to make them whole.
QUERY: A management company says that they do not always have to include copies of our documents in the Resale Certificate because they use the following language:
- Attachments, to the best of our knowledge, include all current amendments and accompany this certificate.
- There are no attachments. Documents have been provided by the seller
FALSE: CIOA, Sec. 47 270 clearly states ” copies provided by the association pursuant to this section”. Copies of the documents must be complete and accurate.
QUERY: As president of our Board, someone told me I should review each resale certificate before it is issued by our management company.
FALSE: No one member of the board should have this responsibility. Given the time limits outlined in Section 47-270 it would not be prudent since any delay in providing this material to the selling owner could place the board in a potential position of interfering with the contract for sale of the unit. The Board should have an attorney review the resale certificate when contracting with a new management company. Board can also request a copy of any completed certificate.
General Advice
When contracting any management company, a board may wish to have legal counsel review the resale certificate for content. In addition, even though management may request all condo documents from your legal counsel, the board should review these documents to ensure all proper and current documents have been provided.
If an association provides information in the resale certificate that it is not required to disclose under the Act, or provides incomplete documents and that information leads to a cancellation of the sale by the purchaser, the association could possibly be subject to a lawsuit. Therefore, it is very important that the association ensure management takes the utmost care in preparing its resale certificates. If a board is uncertain, check with legal counsel. (Note: there are several causes of action that a buyer or seller can use to sue the Association for the resale. Section 47-278 creates a cause of action for violation of the statute. A buyer can sue for negligent or intentional misrepresentation.
Since the onus of the resale certificate falls to the association not management, litigation falls on the shoulders of the Association……….. and ultimately a cost to all unit owners.
The Statute
Sec. 47-270. Resales of units
(b) (1) Not later than ten business days after receipt of a request in a record from a unit owner and payment by the unit owner of a fee established by the association that does not exceed one hundred twenty-five dollars
- plus either five cents for each page of document copies provided by the association pursuant to this section or
- a flat fee of ten dollars for an electronic version of those documents, for the preparation of the certificate and other documents, the association shall furnish a certificate containing the information necessary to enable the unit owner to comply with this section and any other documents required by this section.
- An additional fee of not more than ten dollars for expedited preparation may be established if the certificate and all required documents are furnished to the unit owner not later than three business days after the request in a record is received by the association.
- No fee under this subsection may include costs for services provided by an attorney or paralegal.
If you have questions, legal counsel can provide information on Connecticut law.
How come CCOC members never vote on anything proposed by the board? How come there is no soliciting of new board members and existing members stepping down after a few years? Where is the transparency of this organization? There is no communication about CCOC meetings. Seems like there are no meetings. Am I wrong?
We are a small group of volunteers and not any kind of association. We do everything publicly. We meet infrequently and usually by telephone. Any decision that we take is transmitted to our members. We are all volunteers who focus on trying to help individual owners and associations. We have come a long way since the previous group left us in shambles. We have asked for volunteers but few qualified people have raised their hands.
please read my response, its in English.
I find your response “Please read my response, its in English” offensive. It speaks volumes.
If there is real interest in reaching condo owners statewide, enhancing transparency and engaging owners in discussion how to improve matters in CT for owners, which I believe would encourage volunteerism, would you be willing to start a CCOC Facebook page?
Also, how about whenever someone leaves a reply to a message here or makes a comment here, all CCOC members with email will be sent an email alert to read new comment?
How many CCOC members are there presently receiving the CCOC newsletter?
considering your background, it doesn’t appear you have much idea what we do.
I was wondering about facebook too. When I click on the fb icon on your page where it says “follow us” ..nothing works. Would love to share the fb page w/ other members in my condo community. It doesn’t seem like the info on the webpage is updated often.
George, We need your help in the Capitol region of CT the largest populated region of CT that is affected by crumbling foundations. We have six large complexes affected by crumbling foundations as we have a sulfide mineral in the aggregate used to make the concrete walls in our foundations. Thus far we have been treated like second class citizens. I wrote a few months ago and never received a response and we are going to go to the media on the way we have been treated by our legislators in that they have excluded condo’s over 4 units from the Captive Insurance financial aide to homeowners/condo owners affected. So far all the proposed bills this legislative session still have the old definition of a “residential building” all of the condo complexes affected have 90% of their buildings with six to eight units on one foundation, so that excluded all of us, and then they have put an arbitrary Condo Cap on units to cover only $43,750 per unit when I put together the quotes for the complexes and the average cost is $87,000 per unit, our complexes are already paying high condo fees and special assessments, and right now the bank loan program excludes us from help because of the definition of a residential building. If FEMA comes to CT they exclude condo’s, the casualty loss Congressman Courtney got for homeowners doesn’t help any of us condo owners as our foundations are a “common element” we are excluded from any and all help thus far, we need your advice.
how do I join ccoc for help